Local help →Randwick, Whiteshill and Ruscombe · Stroud
Randwick, Whiteshill and Ruscombe electoral ward · May 2026 boundaries. Every figure carries its own date.
Qualifications show local skills, not whether people have secure jobs or use those skills at work.
21 March 2021 · ward and council use the same source, measure and date.
The difference is in percentage points. The wider figure is the published council total, not the average of its wards. Differences describe groups, not every resident.
Source →The share of social housing describes the homes already here. It does not show the current waiting list or whether enough suitable homes are available.
21 March 2021 · ward and council use the same source, measure and date.
The difference is in percentage points. The wider figure is the published council total, not the average of its wards. Differences describe groups, not every resident.
Source →A larger private-rented sector changes the mix of housing advice, enforcement and tenant support needed. It does not tell us whether individual homes are affordable or safe.
21 March 2021 · ward and council use the same source, measure and date.
The difference is in percentage points. The wider figure is the published council total, not the average of its wards. Differences describe groups, not every resident.
Source →People aged 65 or over
28.6%21 March 2021 · Randwick, Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator
All usual residents
577 out of 2,015.
Source and method →People reporting bad or very bad health
4.1%21 March 2021 · Randwick, Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator
All usual residents; self-reported, not age-standardised
83 out of 2,015.
Source and method →People counted in the census
2,01421 March 2021 · Randwick, Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator
All usual residents
2,014 out of 2,014.
Source and method →People aged 16+ with a degree or equivalent
46.4%21 March 2021 · Randwick, Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator
Residents aged 16 and over
808 out of 1,743.
Source and method →Households facing at least one measured disadvantage
43.8%21 March 2021 · Randwick, Whiteshill and Ruscombe
The census checks education, employment, health and housing. This is not a measure of income or poverty.
Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator
All households
383 out of 875.
Source and method →Households facing two or more measured disadvantages
10.3%21 March 2021 · Randwick, Whiteshill and Ruscombe
The census checks education, employment, health and housing. This is not a measure of income or poverty.
Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator
All households
90 out of 875.
Source and method →Residents aged 16+ outside the labour market
42.6%21 March 2021 · Randwick, Whiteshill and Ruscombe
21 March 2021, residents aged 16 and over. Includes full-time students in the corresponding work/unemployment categories. Not a current labour-market estimate or the usual 16–64 employment rate. Census took place during the coronavirus pandemic; furlough and lockdown affected answers. Ward counts sum complete official output-area best-fit membership; privacy adjustment can make totals differ slightly.
All usual residents aged 16 and over
744 out of 1,748.
Source and method →Residents aged 16+ in work
55.9%21 March 2021 · Randwick, Whiteshill and Ruscombe
21 March 2021, residents aged 16 and over. Includes full-time students in the corresponding work/unemployment categories. Not a current labour-market estimate or the usual 16–64 employment rate. Census took place during the coronavirus pandemic; furlough and lockdown affected answers. Ward counts sum complete official output-area best-fit membership; privacy adjustment can make totals differ slightly.
All usual residents aged 16 and over
977 out of 1,748.
Source and method →Residents aged 16+ not working because of long-term illness or disability
1.8%21 March 2021 · Randwick, Whiteshill and Ruscombe
21 March 2021, residents aged 16 and over. Includes full-time students in the corresponding work/unemployment categories. Not a current labour-market estimate or the usual 16–64 employment rate. Census took place during the coronavirus pandemic; furlough and lockdown affected answers. Ward counts sum complete official output-area best-fit membership; privacy adjustment can make totals differ slightly.
All usual residents aged 16 and over
31 out of 1,748.
Source and method →People aged 16+ with no qualifications
10.7%21 March 2021 · Randwick, Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator
Residents aged 16 and over
187 out of 1,743.
Source and method →Homes rented privately
8%21 March 2021 · Randwick, Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator
All households
72 out of 875.
Source and method →Residents aged 16+ retired
32%21 March 2021 · Randwick, Whiteshill and Ruscombe
21 March 2021, residents aged 16 and over. Includes full-time students in the corresponding work/unemployment categories. Not a current labour-market estimate or the usual 16–64 employment rate. Census took place during the coronavirus pandemic; furlough and lockdown affected answers. Ward counts sum complete official output-area best-fit membership; privacy adjustment can make totals differ slightly.
All usual residents aged 16 and over
559 out of 1,748.
Source and method →Homes rented from a council or housing association
6%21 March 2021 · Randwick, Whiteshill and Ruscombe
Published Census 2021 count; percentage uses the matching population denominator
All households
51 out of 875.
Source and method →Residents aged 16+ unemployed
1.5%21 March 2021 · Randwick, Whiteshill and Ruscombe
21 March 2021, residents aged 16 and over. Includes full-time students in the corresponding work/unemployment categories. Not a current labour-market estimate or the usual 16–64 employment rate. Census took place during the coronavirus pandemic; furlough and lockdown affected answers. Ward counts sum complete official output-area best-fit membership; privacy adjustment can make totals differ slightly. Unemployed residents as a share of all residents aged 16+; this is not the unemployment rate among economically active people.
All usual residents aged 16 and over
27 out of 1,748.
Source and method →Police UK publication gap, checked 2026-10-17: Gloucestershire Constabulary: Crime data not provided for August 2026. The force will provide a data refresh as soon as possible. A complete two-year ward comparison is therefore withheld; other forces’ nearby records are not substituted.
A nearby project is not proof of a benefit to the whole ward. Only source-supported ward links are attached here.
No project boundary has been verified against this ward. See projects and their stated locations →
Proposed responses across Stroud →