Skip to content
Gloucestershire Counts — Gloucestershire, in numbers.Local help →

Tewkesbury, in numbers

Issues and SWOT: Tewkesbury

Tewkesbury local authority area. Every figure carries its own date.

Strengths to build on. Pressures to address. Choices to make.

These assessments connect evidence with proposed responses. They are not ratings of council performance.

Strengths

strength

Build a useful timetable at Homelands

An operator has taken over a purpose-built community centre.

Proposed response: Turn residents’ feedback into accessible activities.

Evidence

What could help →

strength

Make room for homes people can afford

Average private rent is £1,093 a month (August 2026) in Tewkesbury council area. This is £366 lower than the England average for the same month. Homes rented privately ranged from 7.9% in Cleeve Hill to 24.5% in Innsworth — a gap of 16.6 percentage points.

Housing costs matter most alongside earnings and the number of affordable homes available. A local average cannot tell us whether a particular household can afford its home.

What could help →

strength

Bring support closer to people in poor health

3.9% of people reported bad or very bad health in Tewkesbury council area (21 March 2021). Across England, the figure was 5.2%. People reporting bad or very bad health ranged from 2.3% in Isbourne to 6.2% in Brockworth East — a gap of 3.9 percentage points.

This is how residents described their health in the census. It can reveal differences between neighbourhoods, but does not diagnose illness or measure current waiting times. Age profiles differ between places, so these shares do not measure service quality.

What could help →

strength

Connect local skills to local opportunities

35.9% of people aged 16 or over had a degree or equivalent (21 March 2021) in Tewkesbury council area. Across England, the figure was 33.9%. People aged 16+ with no qualifications ranged from 9.3% in Cleeve West to 20.5% in Tewkesbury South — a gap of 11.2 percentage points.

Qualifications show one part of the skills available locally. They do not show whether people have secure jobs or work that uses those skills.

What could help →

Weaknesses

weakness

Match sports provision to new housing

Wheatpieces funding specifically responds to needs from growth.

Proposed response: Choose projects with evidence of demand and affordable access.

Evidence

What could help →

Opportunities

opportunity

Make developer contributions visible locally

Sports contributions are available for Wheatpieces pitches and changing rooms.

Proposed response: Track money from selection to usable facilities.

Evidence

What could help →

opportunity

Plan homes and care around an older population

22.2% of people in Tewkesbury council area were aged 65 or over (21 March 2021). People aged 65 or over ranged from 13.3% in Innsworth to 31.3% in Tewkesbury North & Twyning — a gap of 18 percentage points.

Age alone does not mean poor health or a need for care. Accessible homes, reliable transport and support close to home matter as people get older.

What could help →

opportunity

Turn published plans into visible progress

3 named local projects or plans have official evidence in this collection.

A published plan makes responsibilities and intentions easier to inspect. It does not prove that funding is secured or that promised benefits have arrived.

What could help →

opportunity

Target support where disadvantages overlap

Households facing two or more measured disadvantages ranged from 7.8% in Cleeve Hill to 18.8% in Tewkesbury South — a gap of 11 percentage points.

These households met at least two census conditions covering education, employment, health and housing. This is not an income or poverty measure.

What could help →

Threats

threat

Follow through on Tirley drainage actions

The approved plan includes action from the Tirley flooding review.

Proposed response: Maintain a clear list of owners and completed work.

Evidence

What could help →